Updated: Give Andrew Shaw credit for taking ownership of what was an ugly situation:
“I’m so glad the Chicago Blackhawks are a tolerant organization…”
Said no one, ever.
After Tuesday night, that divide only deepens. It’s now been proven that the Blackhawks espouse misogyny (Garret Ross), sexual deviance (Patrick Kane) and now, homophobia.
The whole English-speaking world saw what Andrew Shaw said in the late moments of Chicago’s 4-3 loss to St. Louis in a Western Conference quarterfinal series.
I’m not going to repeat it, but Google it yourself (or click here) and make up your own mind as to whether or not he used a homophobic slur.
Shaw said he didn’t remember what he said.
That’s an overused defense. I usually say that when I’m lying.
In an ideal world … Andrew Shaw could go against the grain of his organization. In an ideal world, he makes a public apology, admits what he says was wrong and insensitive, and inappropriate, and vows to educate himself on societal issues facing the LGBT community.
But wait, this is the Blackhawks. That probably won’t happen.
This is an organization that employs Patrick Kane.
And – it might just be a case of awful timing – an organization that gave away aprons the same week it was announced Ross, a minor-league player in Chicago’s farm system, was being charged with revenge porn, a charge later dropped on a technicality.
Bad timing, bad connotation.
It’s fair to ask, is the Blackhawks management doing anything to educate its players and employees about societal issues?
On a macro level in sports … is anyone doing anything in any organization?
Watching Andrew Shaw yell whatever it was he did (and we have a pretty good idea of what he said), made me think of a similar talk I had a few years ago with a college hockey player, who now plays professionally. It came in light of another incident in which a professional athlete used a homophobic slur.
“Do you ever say that on the ice?” I asked him.
He sighed. “Sometimes, yeah.”
“Do you ever think about what you say?”
Some things, he said – almost in a defensive, yet resigned tone – come in the heat of the game.
I wasn’t going to take that for an answer.
“Well, think about it next time.” Then, I laughed, and offered him some vulgar advice. “It’s okay to say someone’s a ‘f#%&er’ … but it’s not okay to say what that guy said last night.”
We laughed – I think he was a little surprised that, being a woman, I said such a dark word. I was comfortable with cussing around him, but I hope I helped Will think a little differently after that conversation.
Sometimes, though, I wonder if I did.
Let’s be real: it’s 2016, but sports are not a kind, welcoming or tolerant environment, despite the advances that have been made for inclusion. This, many still believe, is a man’s domain.
Want to see a gender gap? Want to see a hostile realm? Turn on or buy a ticket to a major-league sporting event, and count the number of women you see and find out what their role is in the game.
It might make me a hypocrite that I give my money to professional sports teams, or that I cover sports for a living, but that’s also something we as a society have to do – hold the people we cover and financially support to a certain standard.
And we’re discussing a realm in which people attempt to justify what some people believe is inherent and acceptable in sports – such as homophobic/misogynistic/racist/sexist/deviant behavior – by saying, “Oh, it’s just part of the culture.”
No, it’s not acceptable.
Do you discriminate or lampoon others in everyday life because of their race? Because of their gender? Because of their ethnic background?
It shouldn’t be done in a confined space such as an ice rink or a football field, either. Because, as Andrew Shaw and the Blackhawks are finding out, all of us are watching.